motorola razr 40
$970
motorola razr 40 vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E
$719
| razr 40 | X300 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 970 | USD 719 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 144Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 251 cheaper
X300 EUSD 719
vsrazr 40USD 970
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X300 E12 GB RAM
vsrazr 408 GB RAM
Battery
71% larger battery
X300 E7,200 mAh
vsrazr 404,200 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
X300 E90 W wired
vsrazr 4030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
razr 40Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
Larger display
razr 406.9-inch
vsX300 E6.59-inch
Build
11 g lighter
razr 40188.6 g
vsX300 E199.5 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactmotorola razr 40
Larger 6.9-inch6.9-inch
Lighter build188.6 g
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 E
Much lower purchase priceUSD 719
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
What CompareTab says about motorola razr 40 vs vivo X300 E
vivo X300 E offers more RAM and faster wired charging than razr 40, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, and 90 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. motorola razr 40, however, is lighter at 188.6 g versus 199.5 g and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 7.79 mm and has a larger 6.9 inch display. The main trade-off is X300 E’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus razr 40’s larger display and lighter, thinner build.
