motorola razr 40
$970
motorola razr 40 vs vivo X300 pro
vivo X300 pro
$745
| razr 40 | X300 pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 970 | USD 745 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 144Hz | 6.78" • LTPO AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 225 cheaper
X300 proUSD 745
vsrazr 40USD 970
RAM
2× more RAM
X300 pro16 GB RAM
vsrazr 408 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X300 pro512 GB
vsrazr 40256 GB
Battery
55% larger battery
X300 pro6,510 mAh
vsrazr 404,200 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
X300 pro90 W wired
vsrazr 4030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
razr 40Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
vsX300 proMediaTek Dimensity 9500
Display
144 Hz refresh
razr 40144 Hz
vsX300 pro120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Up to 144 Hz displaymotorola razr 40
Up to 144 Hz display6.9-inch
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X300 pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 745
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger battery6,510 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
What CompareTab says about motorola razr 40 vs vivo X300 pro
vivo X300 pro combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than razr 40, with 16 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB, a 6510 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, and 90 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. motorola razr 40, however, is lighter at 188.6 g versus 226 g and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 7.99 mm. The main trade-off is X300 pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and camera features versus razr 40’s lighter, thinner build.
