motorola razr 40
$970
motorola razr 40 vs POCO F8 Ultra
POCO F8 Ultra
$729
| razr 40 | F8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 970 | USD 729 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 144Hz | 6.9" • POCO HyperRGB AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 241 cheaper
F8 UltraUSD 729
vsrazr 40USD 970
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F8 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsrazr 408 GB RAM
Battery
55% larger battery
F8 Ultra6,500 mAh
vsrazr 404,200 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
F8 Ultra100 W wired
vsrazr 4030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
razr 40Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
vsF8 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
razr 40144 Hz
vsF8 Ultra120 Hz
Build
29 g lighter
razr 40188.6 g
vsF8 Ultra218 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactmotorola razr 40
Up to 144 Hz display6.9-inch
Lighter build188.6 g
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F8 Ultra
Much lower purchase priceUSD 729
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about motorola razr 40 vs POCO F8 Ultra
POCO F8 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than razr 40, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 6500 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, and 100 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a telephoto rear camera. motorola razr 40, however, is lighter at 188.6 g versus 218 g and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 7.9 mm. The main trade-off is F8 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and telephoto rear camera versus razr 40’s lighter, thinner build.
