motorola razr 40
$970
motorola razr 40 vs ROG Phone 9
ROG Phone 9
$1,000
| razr 40 | Phone 9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 970 | USD 1,000 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 65 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 144Hz | 6.78" • Samsung flexible LTPO AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 29.99 cheaper
razr 40USD 970
vsPhone 9USD 1,000
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Phone 912 GB RAM
vsrazr 408 GB RAM
Battery
38% larger battery
Phone 95,800 mAh
vsrazr 404,200 mAh
Charging
35 W faster wired charging
Phone 965 W wired
vsrazr 4030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
razr 40Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
vsPhone 9Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Display
185 Hz refresh
Phone 9185 Hz
vsrazr 40144 Hz
Build
38 g lighter
razr 40188.6 g
vsPhone 9227 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricemotorola razr 40
Much lower purchase priceUSD 970
Lighter build188.6 g
Best if you want
More hardwareROG Phone 9
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery5,800 mAh
Faster wired charging65 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.78-inch
What CompareTab says about motorola razr 40 vs ROG Phone 9
ROG Phone 9 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than razr 40, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 5800 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 144 Hz, and 65 W wired charging versus 30 W. motorola razr 40, however, is lighter at 188.6 g versus 227 g and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 8.9 mm. The choice comes down to Phone 9’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus razr 40’s lighter, thinner build.
