motorola razr 40
$970
motorola razr 40 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| razr 40 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 970 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 144Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 171 cheaper
F9 UltraUSD 799
vsrazr 40USD 970
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsrazr 408 GB RAM
Battery
92% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsrazr 404,200 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsrazr 4030 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
razr 40Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Ultra185 Hz
vsrazr 40144 Hz
Build
46 g lighter
razr 40188.6 g
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactmotorola razr 40
Lighter build188.6 g
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
Much lower purchase priceUSD 799
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
What CompareTab says about motorola razr 40 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM and faster wired charging than razr 40, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 4200 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 144 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 30 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. motorola razr 40, however, is lighter at 188.6 g versus 235 g and thinner at 7.35 mm versus 8.74 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus razr 40’s lighter, thinner build.
