vivo X200
$780
vivo X200 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| X200 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 780 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Battery
39% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsX2005,800 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsX20090 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
X200MediaTek Dimensity 9400
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsX2006.67″ · 120Hz
Build
38 g lighter
X200197 g
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
F9 Ultra200MP rear
vsX20050MP rear
Build
More compact thickness
X2007.99 mm
vsF9 Ultra8.74 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactvivo X200
Lighter build197 g
Thinner body7.99 mm
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
Higher-resolution main camera200MP rear
What CompareTab says about vivo X200 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra has the larger display and faster wired charging than X200, with a 8050 mAh battery versus 5800 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 90 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP) and wireless charging. vivo X200, however, is lighter at 197 g versus 235 g and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.74 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, higher-resolution front camera, and wireless charging versus X200’s lighter, thinner build.
