vivo X200
$780
vivo X200 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| X200 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 780 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 81 cheaper
F9 ProUSD 699
vsX200USD 780
Battery
9% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsX2005,800 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsX20090 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
X200MediaTek Dimensity 9400
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsX200120 Hz
Build
9 g lighter
X200197 g
vsF9 Pro206 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
F9 Pro200MP rear
vsX20050MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactvivo X200
Lighter build197 g
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about vivo X200 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has the larger display and faster wired charging than X200, with a 6330 mAh battery versus 5800 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 90 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP) and wireless charging. vivo X200, however, is lighter at 197 g versus 206 g and thinner at 7.99 mm versus 8.79 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, higher-resolution front camera, and wireless charging versus X200’s lighter, thinner build.
