vivo X200
$780
vivo X200 vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno14 Pro 5G
$585
| X200 | Reno14 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 780 | USD 585 |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 90 | 80 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Display | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.83" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 195 cheaper
Reno14 Pro 5GUSD 585
vsX200USD 780
Battery
7% larger battery
Reno14 Pro 5G6,200 mAh
vsX2005,800 mAh
Charging
10 W faster wired charging
X20090 W wired
vsReno14 Pro 5G80 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
X200MediaTek Dimensity 9400
vsReno14 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 8450
Display
Larger display
Reno14 Pro 5G6.83-inch
vsX2006.67-inch
Build
More compact thickness
Reno14 Pro 5G7.48 mm
vsX2007.99 mm
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
Reno14 Pro 5G50MP front
vsX20032MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Faster wired chargingvivo X200
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno14 Pro 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 585
Larger battery6,200 mAh
Larger 6.83-inch6.83-inch
Thinner body7.48 mm
What CompareTab says about vivo X200 vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno14 Pro 5G has the larger display than X200, with a 6200 mAh battery versus 5800 mAh and a 6.83 inch display versus 6.67 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and wireless charging. vivo X200, however, has higher quoted peak brightness at 4500 nits versus 1200 nits and supports faster wired charging at 90 W versus 80 W. The main trade-off is the Reno14 Pro 5G’s battery capacity, larger display, higher-resolution front camera, and wireless charging versus the X200’s higher quoted peak brightness and faster charging.
