Xiaomi Poco C75
$109
Xiaomi Poco C75 vs ZTE Nubia A36
ZTE Nubia A36
$65
| Poco C75 | Nubia A36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 109 | USD 65 |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra | Unisoc T606 |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD Dot Drop Display • 120Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 44 cheaper
Nubia A36USD 65
vsPoco C75USD 109
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Poco C756 GB RAM
vsNubia A364 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Poco C75128 GB
vsNubia A3664 GB
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Poco C7518 W wired
vsNubia A3610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Poco C75MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra
vsNubia A36Unisoc T606
Display
120 Hz refresh
Poco C75120 Hz
vsNubia A3690 Hz
Build
12 g lighter
Nubia A36192 g
vsPoco C75204 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Poco C75
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.88-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Nubia A36
Much lower purchase priceUSD 65
Lighter build192 g
What CompareTab says about Xiaomi Poco C75 vs ZTE Nubia A36
Xiaomi Poco C75 offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Nubia A36, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 5 MP), and NFC. ZTE Nubia A36, however, is cheaper at around $65 versus $109 and lighter at 192 g versus 204 g. The main trade-off is Poco C75’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus Nubia A36’s lower price and lighter build.
