Vivo Y200 256GB
$235
Vivo Y200 256GB vs OPPO A12
OPPO A12
$179
| Y200 256GB | A12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 235 | USD 179 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4230 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Helio P35 |
| Display | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.22" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 9 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 56 cheaper
A12USD 179
vsY200 256GBUSD 235
RAM
2× more RAM
Y200 256GB8 GB RAM
vsA124 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Y200 256GB256 GB
vsA1264 GB
Battery
18% larger battery
Y200 256GB5,000 mAh
vsA124,230 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
Y200 256GB80 W wired
vsA1210 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y200 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 685
vsA12MediaTek Helio P35
Display
Larger120Hz
Y200 256GB6.67″ · 120Hz
vsA126.22″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo Y200 256GB
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.67″ · 120Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A12
Much lower purchase priceUSD 179
Smaller 6.22-inch display6.22″
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y200 256GB vs OPPO A12
Vivo Y200 256GB has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A12, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 5 MP), and 80W charging. OPPO A12, however, is around $56.00 cheaper and lighter at 165 g versus 188 g. The main trade-off is the Y200 256GB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the A12’s lower price and lighter build.
