Vivo Y200 256GB
$235
Vivo Y200 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Galaxy M13
$179
| Y200 256GB | Galaxy M13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 235 | USD 179 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 80 | 15 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| Display | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.6" • PLS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 56 cheaper
Galaxy M13USD 179
vsY200 256GBUSD 235
RAM
2× more RAM
Y200 256GB8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M134 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Y200 256GB256 GB
vsGalaxy M13128 GB
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
Y200 256GB80 W wired
vsGalaxy M1315 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y200 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 685
vsGalaxy M13Samsung Exynos 850
Display
120 Hz refresh
Y200 256GB120 Hz
vsGalaxy M1360 Hz
Build
More compact thickness
Y200 256GB7.79 mm
vsGalaxy M138.4 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo Y200 256GB
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.67-inch
Thinner body7.79 mm
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M13
Much lower purchase priceUSD 179
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y200 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy M13
Vivo Y200 256GB combines more RAM and storage with faster wired charging than Galaxy M13, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP). Samsung Galaxy M13, however, is around $56.00 cheaper. The main trade-off is Y200 256GB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy M13’s lower price.
