Samsung Galaxy A13
$179
Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Vivo Y200 256GB
Vivo Y200 256GB
$235
| Galaxy A13 | Y200 256GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 179 | USD 235 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 80 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Display | 6.6" • PLS LCD • 60Hz | 6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 56 cheaper
Galaxy A13USD 179
vsY200 256GBUSD 235
RAM
2× more RAM
Y200 256GB8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A134 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Y200 256GB256 GB
vsGalaxy A13128 GB
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
Y200 256GB80 W wired
vsGalaxy A1315 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A13Samsung Exynos 850
vsY200 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 685
Display
120 Hz refresh
Y200 256GB120 Hz
vsGalaxy A1360 Hz
Build
More compact thickness
Y200 256GB7.79 mm
vsGalaxy A138.8 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A13
Much lower purchase priceUSD 179
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo Y200 256GB
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.67-inch
Thinner body7.79 mm
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Vivo Y200 256GB
Vivo Y200 256GB offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Galaxy A13, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 8 MP). Samsung Galaxy A13, however, is around $56.00 cheaper. The choice comes down to Y200 256GB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A13’s lower price.
