Samsung Galaxy S26
$900
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60
$699
| Galaxy S26 | Razr 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 900 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 30 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Display | 6.3" • Dynamic AMOLED 2X LTPO • 120Hz | 6.9" • Foldable LTPO pOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 200.99 cheaper
Razr 60USD 699
vsGalaxy S26USD 900
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Galaxy S2612 GB RAM
vsRazr 608 GB RAM
Battery
5% larger battery
Razr 604,500 mAh
vsGalaxy S264,300 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Razr 6030 W wired
vsGalaxy S2625 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy S26Samsung Exynos 2600
vsRazr 60MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Display
Larger display
Razr 606.9-inch
vsGalaxy S266.3-inch
Build
21 g lighter
Galaxy S26167 g
vsRazr 60188 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy S26
More RAM12 GB RAM
Lighter build167 g
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Razr 60
Much lower purchase priceUSD 699
Larger battery4,500 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Larger 6.9-inch6.9-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Motorola Razr 60
Motorola Razr 60 has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy S26, with a 4500 mAh battery versus 4300 mAh, a 6.9 inch display versus 6.3 inch, and 30 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 12 MP). Samsung Galaxy S26, however, is lighter at 167 g versus 188 g and offers 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB. The choice comes down to Razr 60’s faster charging, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy S26’s lighter build.
