Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB
$499
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2,899
| Galaxy A72 256GB | Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 499 | USD 2,899 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 45 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 10" • Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 10MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 2,400 cheaper
Galaxy A72 256GBUSD 499
vsGalaxy Z TriFoldUSD 2,899
RAM
2× more RAM
Galaxy Z TriFold16 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A72 256GB8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy Z TriFold512 GB
vsGalaxy A72 256GB256 GB
Battery
12% larger battery
Galaxy Z TriFold5,600 mAh
vsGalaxy A72 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Galaxy Z TriFold45 W wired
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A72 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 720G
vsGalaxy Z TriFoldQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Display
Larger120Hz
Galaxy Z TriFold10″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A72 256GB6.7″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A72 256GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
Smaller 6.7-inch display6.7″
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy Z TriFold
More RAM and storage16 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger battery5,600 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display10″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A72 256GB, with 16 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 256 GB, a 5600 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP), wireless charging, and 45W charging. Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB, however, is around $2,400 cheaper and lighter at 203 g versus 309 g and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The main trade-off is Galaxy Z TriFold’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A72 256GB’s lower price, lighter build, and higher-resolution front camera.
