Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB
$499
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB
$1,660
| Galaxy A72 256GB | Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 499 | USD 1,660 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 45 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 1024 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.9" • Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 12MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 1,160.99 cheaper
Galaxy A72 256GBUSD 499
vsGalaxy S25 Ultra 1TBUSD 1,660
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A72 256GB8 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB1,024 GB
vsGalaxy A72 256GB256 GB
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB45 W wired
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A72 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 720G
vsGalaxy S25 Ultra 1TBQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
Display
Larger120Hz
Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB6.9″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A72 256GB6.7″ · 90Hz
Build
15 g lighter
Galaxy A72 256GB203 g
vsGalaxy S25 Ultra 1TB218 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A72 256GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
Lighter build203 g
Smaller 6.7-inch display6.7″
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 1,024 GB
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.9″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Galaxy A72 256GB, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 1024 GB of storage versus 256 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP) and wireless charging. Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB, however, is around $1,161 cheaper and lighter at 203 g versus 218 g and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Galaxy S25 Ultra 1TB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A72 256GB’s lower price, lighter build, and higher-resolution front camera.
