Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs vivo X500

close
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

$499

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
vivo X500

vivo X500

$764

12 GB RAM 256 GB

Galaxy A72 256GBX500
PriceUSD 499USD 764
Battery5000 mAh7500 mAh
Charging (W)2590
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720GMediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz
Main Camera64MP50MP
Front Camera32MP50MP
OSAndroid 11Android 17

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 265 cheaper
vsX500USD 764
RAM
4 GB more RAM
vsGalaxy A72 256GB8 GB RAM
Battery
50% larger battery
vsGalaxy A72 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsX500MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display
144 Hz refresh
vsGalaxy A72 256GB90 Hz
Build
8 g lighter
vsX500211 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
Lighter build203 g
Best if you want

vivo X500

More hardware
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs vivo X500

vivo X500 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A72 256GB, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and wireless charging. Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB, however, is around $265 cheaper and lighter at 203 g versus 211 g. The main trade-off is X500’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A72 256GB’s lower price and lighter build.