Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB
$499
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy A72 256GB | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 499 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 200 cheaper
Galaxy A72 256GBUSD 499
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A72 256GB8 GB RAM
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy A72 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A72 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 720G
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsGalaxy A72 256GB90 Hz
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
F9 Pro200MP rear
vsGalaxy A72 256GB64MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A72 256GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A72 256GB, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 100 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP) and wireless charging. Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB, however, is around $200 cheaper and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 8.79 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A72 256GB’s lower price and thinner body.
