Samsung Galaxy A50
$350
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo S60t
vivo S60t
$540
| Galaxy A50 | S60t | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 540 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 190 cheaper
Galaxy A50USD 350
vsS60tUSD 540
RAM
2× more RAM
S60t12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
S60t256 GB
vsGalaxy A50128 GB
Battery
80% larger battery
S60t7,200 mAh
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
S60t90 W wired
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A50Samsung Exynos 9610
vsS60tQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Display
Larger144Hz
S60t6.59″ · 144Hz
vsGalaxy A506.4″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 350
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S60t
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 144Hz display6.59″ · 144Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo S60t
vivo S60t offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 25 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 25 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is around $190 cheaper and lighter at 166 g versus 207 g. The main trade-off is the S60t’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A50’s lower price and lighter build.
