Samsung Galaxy A32
$280
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro
$903
| Galaxy A32 | X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 280 | USD 903 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.36" • LTPO AMOLED (8T) • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 20MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 623 cheaper
Galaxy A32USD 280
vsX500 ProUSD 903
RAM
2× more RAM
X500 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A326 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X500 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy A32128 GB
Battery
30% larger battery
X500 Pro6,510 mAh
vsGalaxy A325,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
X500 Pro90 W wired
vsGalaxy A3215 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A32MediaTek Helio G80
vsX500 ProMediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500 Pro144 Hz
vsGalaxy A3290 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A32
Much lower purchase priceUSD 280
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,510 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.36-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A32 vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A32, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6510 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 20 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A32, however, is around $623 cheaper and lighter at 184 g versus 192 g. The main trade-off is X500 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A32’s lower price and lighter build.
