Samsung Galaxy A32
$280
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs OPPO A7 Pro 5G
OPPO A7 Pro 5G
$325
| Galaxy A32 | A7 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 280 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 45 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 20MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 45 cheaper
Galaxy A32USD 280
vsA7 Pro 5GUSD 325
Storage
2× more storage
A7 Pro 5G256 GB
vsGalaxy A32128 GB
Battery
60% larger battery
A7 Pro 5G8,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A325,000 mAh
Charging
30 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro 5G45 W wired
vsGalaxy A3215 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A32MediaTek Helio G80
vsA7 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max
Display
Larger120Hz
A7 Pro 5G6.57″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A326.4″ · 90Hz
Build
21 g lighter
Galaxy A32184 g
vsA7 Pro 5G205 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A32
Much lower purchase priceUSD 280
Lighter build184 g
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro 5G
More storage256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.57″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A32 vs OPPO A7 Pro 5G
OPPO A7 Pro 5G has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A32, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 20 MP). Samsung Galaxy A32, however, is cheaper at around $280 versus $325, lighter at 184 g versus 205 g, and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 8.8 mm. The main trade-off is A7 Pro 5G’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A32’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
