Samsung Galaxy A32 vs vivo X500

close
Samsung Galaxy A32

Samsung Galaxy A32

$280

6 GB RAM 128 GB

close
vivo X500

vivo X500

$764

12 GB RAM 256 GB

Galaxy A32X500
PriceUSD 280USD 764
Battery5000 mAh7500 mAh
Charging (W)1590
RAM6 GB12 GB
Storage128 GB256 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G80MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz
Main Camera64MP50MP
Front Camera20MP50MP
OSAndroid 11Android 17

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 484 cheaper
vsX500USD 764
RAM
2× more RAM
vsGalaxy A326 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
vsGalaxy A32128 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
vsGalaxy A325,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A3215 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsX500MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display
Larger144Hz
vsGalaxy A326.4″ · 90Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A32

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 280
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want

vivo X500

More hardware
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 144Hz display6.59″ · 144Hz

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A32 vs vivo X500

vivo X500 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A32, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 20 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A32, however, is around $484 cheaper and lighter at 184 g versus 211 g. The main trade-off is X500’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A32’s lower price and lighter build.