Samsung Galaxy A32
$280
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy A32 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 280 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 20MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 419 cheaper
Galaxy A32USD 280
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A326 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy A32128 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy A325,000 mAh
Charging
85 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy A3215 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A32MediaTek Helio G80
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsGalaxy A326.4″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A32
Much lower purchase priceUSD 280
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A32 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A32, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 20 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 100W charging. Samsung Galaxy A32, however, is around $419 cheaper, lighter at 184 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 8.79 mm. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A32’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
