Samsung Galaxy A16
$149
Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15
$419
| Galaxy A16 | K15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 419 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 80 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED (flexible) • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 270 cheaper
Galaxy A16USD 149
vsK15USD 419
RAM
3× more RAM
K1512 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A164 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
K15256 GB
vsGalaxy A16128 GB
Battery
60% larger battery
K158,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A165,000 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
K1580 W wired
vsGalaxy A1625 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A16MediaTek Helio G99
vsK15MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super
Display
120 Hz refresh
K15120 Hz
vsGalaxy A1690 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A16
Much lower purchase priceUSD 149
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo K15
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A16, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 80W charging. Samsung Galaxy A16, however, is around $270 cheaper and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.27 mm. The main trade-off is the K15’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A16’s lower price and thinner body.
