Samsung Galaxy A16
$149
Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Alcatel Pixi
Alcatel Pixi
$99
| Galaxy A16 | Pixi | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 99 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 1300 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 GB | N/A |
| Storage | 128 GB | N/A |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm MSM7227A |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 2MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 2.3.6 Gingerbread |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
PixiUSD 99
vsGalaxy A16USD 149
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Galaxy A164 GB RAM
vsPixi0 GB RAM
Storage
128 GB more storage
Galaxy A16128 GB
vsPixi0 GB
Battery
285% larger battery
Galaxy A165,000 mAh
vsPixi1,300 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Galaxy A1625 W wired
vsPixi5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A16MediaTek Helio G99
vsPixiQualcomm MSM7227A
Display
Larger90Hz
Galaxy A166.7″ · 90Hz
vsPixi3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A16
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging25 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.7″ · 90Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel Pixi
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Alcatel Pixi
Samsung Galaxy A16 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Pixi, with 4 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 2 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 0 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 25W charging. Alcatel Pixi, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 118 g versus 200 g. The main trade-off is the Galaxy A16’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Pixi’s lower price and lighter build.
