Samsung Galaxy A16
$149
Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Motorola Moto G77 Power
Motorola Moto G77 Power
$264
| Galaxy A16 | Moto G77 Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 149 | USD 264 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 30 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.72" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 115 cheaper
Galaxy A16USD 149
vsMoto G77 PowerUSD 264
RAM
2× more RAM
Moto G77 Power8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A164 GB RAM
Battery
40% larger battery
Moto G77 Power7,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A165,000 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Moto G77 Power30 W wired
vsGalaxy A1625 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A16MediaTek Helio G99
vsMoto G77 PowerMediaTek Dimensity 6400
Display
120 Hz refresh
Moto G77 Power120 Hz
vsGalaxy A1690 Hz
Build
15 g lighter
Galaxy A16200 g
vsMoto G77 Power215 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A16
Much lower purchase priceUSD 149
Lighter build200 g
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Moto G77 Power
More RAM8 GB RAM
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.72-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Motorola Moto G77 Power
Motorola Moto G77 Power offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A16, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 30 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP). Samsung Galaxy A16, however, is around $115 cheaper, lighter at 200 g versus 215 g, and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.89 mm. The main trade-off is Moto G77 Power’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A16’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
