Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$107
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
$1,800
| Galaxy A03 Core | Galaxy Z Fold 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 107 | USD 1,800 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 25 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Display | 6.5" • PLS TFT LCD • 60Hz | 7.6" • Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 12MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 10MP |
| OS | Android 11 Go Edition | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 1,692.99 cheaper
Galaxy A03 CoreUSD 107
vsGalaxy Z Fold 3USD 1,800
RAM
6× more RAM
Galaxy Z Fold 312 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A03 Core2 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
Galaxy Z Fold 3256 GB
vsGalaxy A03 Core32 GB
Battery
14% larger battery
Galaxy A03 Core5,000 mAh
vsGalaxy Z Fold 34,400 mAh
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Galaxy Z Fold 325 W wired
vsGalaxy A03 Core10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A03 CoreUnisoc SC9863A
vsGalaxy Z Fold 3Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
Display
Larger120Hz
Galaxy Z Fold 37.6″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A03 Core6.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A03 Core
Much lower purchase priceUSD 107
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging25 W wired
Larger 120Hz display7.6″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Galaxy A03 Core, with 12 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 25 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (10 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, however, is around $1,693 cheaper and lighter at 211 g versus 271 g and has a larger 5000 mAh battery versus 4400 mAh. The choice comes down to Galaxy Z Fold 3’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Galaxy A03 Core’s lower price, larger battery, and lighter build.
