Lava O2
$102
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| O2 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 102 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 149 cheaper
O2USD 102
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
2× more RAM
O28 GB RAM
vsY32 (2026)4 GB RAM
Battery
60% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsO25,000 mAh
Charging
26 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsO218 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
O2Unisoc Tiger T616
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsO26.5″ · 90Hz
Build
29 g lighter
O2200 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceLava O2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 102
More RAM8 GB RAM
Lighter build200 g
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Lava O2 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has the larger display and faster wired charging than O2, with a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 18 W. It also adds NFC. Lava O2, however, is around $149 cheaper and lighter at 200 g versus 229 g and offers 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB. The main trade-off is Y32 (2026)’s faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus O2’s lower price and lighter build.
