Lava O2
$102
Lava O2 vs Tecno Spark 50C
Tecno Spark 50C
$178
| O2 | Spark 50C | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 102 | USD 178 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 15 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.78" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 76 cheaper
O2USD 102
vsSpark 50CUSD 178
RAM
2× more RAM
O28 GB RAM
vsSpark 50C4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
O2128 GB
vsSpark 50C64 GB
Battery
200 mAh larger battery
Spark 50C5,200 mAh
vsO25,000 mAh
Charging
3 W faster wired charging
O218 W wired
vsSpark 50C15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
O2Unisoc Tiger T616
vsSpark 50CMediaTek Helio G81
Display
Larger120Hz
Spark 50C6.78″ · 120Hz
vsO26.5″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareLava O2
Much lower purchase priceUSD 102
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 128 GB
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareTecno Spark 50C
Larger battery5,200 mAh
Larger 120Hz display6.78″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Lava O2 vs Tecno Spark 50C
Lava O2 offers more RAM and storage than Spark 50C, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB and 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP). Tecno Spark 50C counters with a larger 5200 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a larger 6.78 inch display, and thinner at 7.9 mm versus 8.7 mm. The main trade-off is O2’s extra RAM, storage, and higher-resolution front camera versus Spark 50C’s larger battery, larger display, and thinner body.
