Apple iPhone 16e
$599
Apple iPhone 16e vs POCO F7
POCO F7
$449
| iPhone 16e | F7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 599 | USD 449 |
| Battery | 4005 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 20 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Display | 6.1" • Super Retina XDR OLED • 60Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 20MP |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 150 cheaper
F7USD 449
vsiPhone 16eUSD 599
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F712 GB RAM
vsiPhone 16e8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F7256 GB
vsiPhone 16e128 GB
Battery
62% larger battery
F76,500 mAh
vsiPhone 16e4,005 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
F790 W wired
vsiPhone 16e20 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
iPhone 16eApple A18
vsF7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Display
Larger120Hz
F76.83″ · 120Hz
vsiPhone 16e6.1″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F7
Much lower purchase priceUSD 449
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
What CompareTab says about Apple iPhone 16e vs POCO F7
POCO F7 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over iPhone 16e, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6500 mAh battery versus 4005 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (20 MP versus 12 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 90W charging. Apple iPhone 16e, however, is lighter at 167 g versus 215.7 g and thinner at 7.8 mm versus 8.2 mm. The main trade-off is F7’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus iPhone 16e’s lighter, thinner build.
