Apple iPhone 16e
$599
Apple iPhone 16e vs OPPO Reno 15F
OPPO Reno 15F
$449
| iPhone 16e | Reno 15F | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 599 | USD 449 |
| Battery | 4005 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 20 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Display | 6.1" • Super Retina XDR OLED • 60Hz | 6.57" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 150 cheaper
Reno 15FUSD 449
vsiPhone 16eUSD 599
Storage
2× more storage
Reno 15F256 GB
vsiPhone 16e128 GB
Battery
75% larger battery
Reno 15F7,000 mAh
vsiPhone 16e4,005 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
Reno 15F80 W wired
vsiPhone 16e20 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
iPhone 16eApple A18
vsReno 15FQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Display
Larger120Hz
Reno 15F6.57″ · 120Hz
vsiPhone 16e6.1″ · 60Hz
Build
28 g lighter
iPhone 16e167 g
vsReno 15F195 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactApple iPhone 16e
Lighter build167 g
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 15F
Much lower purchase priceUSD 449
More storage256 GB
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about Apple iPhone 16e vs OPPO Reno 15F
OPPO Reno 15F has the larger display and faster wired charging than iPhone 16e, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 4005 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 80 W wired charging versus 20 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 12 MP) and an ultrawide rear camera. Apple iPhone 16e, however, is lighter at 167 g versus 195 g and thinner at 7.8 mm versus 8.14 mm. The choice comes down to Reno 15F’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus iPhone 16e’s lighter, thinner build.
