Apple iPhone 16e
$599
Apple iPhone 16e vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15
$419
| iPhone 16e | K15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 599 | USD 419 |
| Battery | 4005 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 20 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Apple A18 | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super |
| Display | 6.1" • Super Retina XDR OLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED (flexible) • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 48MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 50MP |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 180 cheaper
K15USD 419
vsiPhone 16eUSD 599
RAM
4 GB more RAM
K1512 GB RAM
vsiPhone 16e8 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
K15256 GB
vsiPhone 16e128 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
K158,000 mAh
vsiPhone 16e4,005 mAh
Charging
60 W faster wired charging
K1580 W wired
vsiPhone 16e20 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
iPhone 16eApple A18
vsK15MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super
Display
Larger120Hz
K156.59″ · 120Hz
vsiPhone 16e6.1″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo K15
Much lower purchase priceUSD 419
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about Apple iPhone 16e vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over iPhone 16e, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4005 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 12 MP), an ultrawide rear camera, and 80W charging. Apple iPhone 16e, however, is lighter at 167 g versus 205 g and thinner at 7.8 mm versus 8.27 mm. The main trade-off is K15’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus iPhone 16e’s lighter, thinner build.
