Acer Liquid Z
$99
Acer Liquid Z vs Sparx Neo 7 Ultra
Sparx Neo 7 Ultra
$84
| Liquid Z | Neo 7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 84 |
| Battery | 1300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 18 |
| RAM | N/A | 6 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6575M | Unisoc Tiger T616 |
| Display | 3.5" • TFT capacitive touchscreen • 60Hz | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 3.15MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 2.3.7 | Android 12 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 15 cheaper
Neo 7 UltraUSD 84
vsLiquid ZUSD 99
RAM
6 GB more RAM
Neo 7 Ultra6 GB RAM
vsLiquid Z0 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
Neo 7 Ultra128 GB
vsLiquid Z4 GB
Battery
285% larger battery
Neo 7 Ultra5,000 mAh
vsLiquid Z1,300 mAh
Charging
13 W faster wired charging
Neo 7 Ultra18 W wired
vsLiquid Z5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Liquid ZMediaTek MT6575M
vsNeo 7 UltraUnisoc Tiger T616
Display
Larger90Hz
Neo 7 Ultra6.52″ · 90Hz
vsLiquid Z3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSparx Neo 7 Ultra
Much lower purchase priceUSD 84
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging18 W wired
What CompareTab says about Acer Liquid Z vs Sparx Neo 7 Ultra
Sparx Neo 7 Ultra has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Liquid Z, with 6 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 3.15 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 0 MP), and 18W charging.
