Acer Liquid Z
$99
Acer Liquid Z vs OPPO A38
OPPO A38
$219
| Liquid Z | A38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 219 |
| Battery | 1300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 33 |
| RAM | N/A | 6 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6575M | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Display | 3.5" • TFT capacitive touchscreen • 60Hz | 6.56" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 3.15MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 2.3.7 | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 120 cheaper
Liquid ZUSD 99
vsA38USD 219
RAM
6 GB more RAM
A386 GB RAM
vsLiquid Z0 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
A38128 GB
vsLiquid Z4 GB
Battery
285% larger battery
A385,000 mAh
vsLiquid Z1,300 mAh
Charging
28 W faster wired charging
A3833 W wired
vsLiquid Z5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Liquid ZMediaTek MT6575M
vsA38MediaTek Helio G85
Display
Larger90Hz
A386.56″ · 90Hz
vsLiquid Z3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAcer Liquid Z
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A38
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging33 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.56″ · 90Hz
What CompareTab says about Acer Liquid Z vs OPPO A38
OPPO A38 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Liquid Z, with 6 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 3.15 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP), and 33W charging. Acer Liquid Z, however, is around $120 cheaper and lighter at 110 g versus 190 g. The main trade-off is A38’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Liquid Z’s lower price and lighter build.
