itel Zeno 300
$101
itel Zeno 300 vs Oppo Find X10 E
Oppo Find X10 E
$746
| Zeno 300 | Find X10 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 101 | USD 746 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 80 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7100 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s |
| Display | 6.56" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 645 cheaper
Zeno 300USD 101
vsFind X10 EUSD 746
RAM
3× more RAM
Find X10 E12 GB RAM
vsZeno 3004 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Find X10 E256 GB
vsZeno 30064 GB
Battery
17% larger battery
Find X10 E7,025 mAh
vsZeno 3006,000 mAh
Charging
62 W faster wired charging
Find X10 E80 W wired
vsZeno 30018 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Zeno 300Unisoc T7100
vsFind X10 EMediaTek Dimensity 9500s
Display
120 Hz refresh
Find X10 E120 Hz
vsZeno 30090 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceitel Zeno 300
Much lower purchase priceUSD 101
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Find X10 E
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,025 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about itel Zeno 300 vs Oppo Find X10 E
Oppo Find X10 E offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Zeno 300, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7025 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 80W charging. itel Zeno 300, however, is around $645 cheaper. The main trade-off is Find X10 E’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Zeno 300’s lower price.
