itel A300C
$116
itel A300C vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Tecno Pova 8 Pro
$445
| A300C | Pova 8 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 116 | USD 445 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 45 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7100 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Display | 6.56" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.78" • HyperLux AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 16 | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 329 cheaper
A300CUSD 116
vsPova 8 ProUSD 445
RAM
2× more RAM
Pova 8 Pro8 GB RAM
vsA300C4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Pova 8 Pro256 GB
vsA300C64 GB
Battery
8% larger battery
Pova 8 Pro6,500 mAh
vsA300C6,000 mAh
Charging
27 W faster wired charging
Pova 8 Pro45 W wired
vsA300C18 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A300CUnisoc T7100
vsPova 8 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
Display
Larger144Hz
Pova 8 Pro6.78″ · 144Hz
vsA300C6.56″ · 90Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceitel A300C
Much lower purchase priceUSD 116
Smaller 6.56-inch display6.56″
Best if you want
More hardwareTecno Pova 8 Pro
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 144Hz display6.78″ · 144Hz
What CompareTab says about itel A300C vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Tecno Pova 8 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A300C, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6500 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 45W charging. itel A300C, however, is around $329 cheaper. The choice comes down to Pova 8 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A300C’s lower price.
