itel A300C
$116
itel A300C vs Oppo Find X10 E
Oppo Find X10 E
$746
| A300C | Find X10 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 116 | USD 746 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 80 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7100 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s |
| Display | 6.56" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 630 cheaper
A300CUSD 116
vsFind X10 EUSD 746
RAM
3× more RAM
Find X10 E12 GB RAM
vsA300C4 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Find X10 E256 GB
vsA300C64 GB
Battery
17% larger battery
Find X10 E7,025 mAh
vsA300C6,000 mAh
Charging
62 W faster wired charging
Find X10 E80 W wired
vsA300C18 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A300CUnisoc T7100
vsFind X10 EMediaTek Dimensity 9500s
Display
120 Hz refresh
Find X10 E120 Hz
vsA300C90 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceitel A300C
Much lower purchase priceUSD 116
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Find X10 E
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,025 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about itel A300C vs Oppo Find X10 E
Oppo Find X10 E offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A300C, with 12 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 7025 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 80W charging. itel A300C, however, is around $630 cheaper. The choice comes down to Find X10 E’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A300C’s lower price.
