ZTE Blade A34
$90
ZTE Blade A34 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| Blade A34 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 90 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 100 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | UNISOC SC9863A | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.6" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 8MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 709 cheaper
Blade A34USD 90
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
6× more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsBlade A342 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Ultra256 GB
vsBlade A3464 GB
Battery
61% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsBlade A345,000 mAh
Charging
90 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsBlade A3410 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Blade A34UNISOC SC9863A
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsBlade A346.6″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A34
Much lower purchase priceUSD 90
Smaller 6.6-inch display6.6″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about ZTE Blade A34 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Blade A34, with 12 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 8 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. ZTE Blade A34, however, is around $709 cheaper and lighter at 185 g versus 235 g. The main trade-off is F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Blade A34’s lower price and lighter build.
