Alcatel OT-222
$39
Alcatel OT-222 vs ZTE Blade A34
ZTE Blade A34
$90
| OT-222 | Blade A34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 39 | USD 90 |
| Battery | 650 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 2.5 | 10 |
| RAM | N/A | 2 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | N/A | UNISOC SC9863A |
| Display | 1.45" • CSTN LCD, 65K colors • 60Hz | 6.6" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | N/A | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 5MP |
| OS | Proprietary Alcatel feature-phone platform | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 51 cheaper
OT-222USD 39
vsBlade A34USD 90
Storage
8× more storage
OT-222512 GB
vsBlade A3464 GB
Battery
669% larger battery
Blade A345,000 mAh
vsOT-222650 mAh
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Blade A3410 W wired
vsOT-2223 W wired
Display
Larger display
Blade A346.6-inch
vsOT-2221.45-inch
Build
114 g lighter
OT-22271 g
vsBlade A34185 g
Build
More compact thickness
Blade A348.5 mm
vsOT-22211.3 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel OT-222
Much lower purchase priceUSD 39
More storage512 GB
Lighter build71 g
Smaller 1.45-inch display1.45″
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Blade A34
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
Larger 6.6-inch6.6-inch
Thinner body8.5 mm
What CompareTab says about Alcatel OT-222 vs ZTE Blade A34
ZTE Blade A34 has the larger display and faster wired charging than OT-222, with a 5000 mAh battery versus 650 mAh, a 6.6 inch display versus 1.45 inch, and 10 W wired charging versus 2.5 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP). Alcatel OT-222, however, is around $51.00 cheaper and lighter at 71 g versus 185 g and offers 512 GB of storage versus 64 GB. The main trade-off is the Blade A34’s faster charging, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution front camera versus the OT-222’s lower price and lighter build.
