Xiaomi Poco C65
$109
Xiaomi Poco C65 vs ZTE Nubia A36
ZTE Nubia A36
$65
| Poco C65 | Nubia A36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 109 | USD 65 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc T606 |
| Display | 6.74" • A-Si IPS LCD Dot Drop display • 90Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 44 cheaper
Nubia A36USD 65
vsPoco C65USD 109
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Poco C656 GB RAM
vsNubia A364 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Poco C65128 GB
vsNubia A3664 GB
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Poco C6518 W wired
vsNubia A3610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Poco C65MediaTek Helio G85
vsNubia A36Unisoc T606
Camera
Higher resolution
Poco C6550MP rear · 8MP front
vsNubia A3613MP rear · 5MP front
Connectivity
Adds NFC
Poco C65NFC
vsNubia A36No NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Poco C65
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Higher-resolution cameras50MP rear · 8MP front
NFCNFC
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Nubia A36
Much lower purchase priceUSD 65
What CompareTab says about Xiaomi Poco C65 vs ZTE Nubia A36
Xiaomi Poco C65 offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Nubia A36, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP) and NFC. ZTE Nubia A36, however, is cheaper at around $65 versus $109. The choice comes down to Poco C65’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, and higher-resolution front camera versus Nubia A36’s lower price.
