Vivo Y73
$300
Vivo Y73 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Y73 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 300 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.44" • AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 399 cheaper
Y73USD 300
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsY738 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsY73128 GB
Battery
58% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsY734,000 mAh
Charging
67 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsY7333 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y73MediaTek Helio G95
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsY736.44″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y73
Much lower purchase priceUSD 300
Smaller 6.44-inch display6.44″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y73 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Y73, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Vivo Y73, however, is around $399 cheaper, lighter at 170 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.38 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Y73’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
