Vivo Y73
$300
Vivo Y73 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB
Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB
$225
| Y73 | Galaxy A17 8GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 300 | USD 225 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 33 | 25 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Display | 6.44" • AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 75 cheaper
Galaxy A17 8GBUSD 225
vsY73USD 300
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy A17 8GB256 GB
vsY73128 GB
Battery
25% larger battery
Galaxy A17 8GB5,000 mAh
vsY734,000 mAh
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Y7333 W wired
vsGalaxy A17 8GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y73MediaTek Helio G95
vsGalaxy A17 8GBMediaTek Helio G99
Display
Larger90Hz
Galaxy A17 8GB6.7″ · 90Hz
vsY736.44″ · 60Hz
Build
22 g lighter
Y73170 g
vsGalaxy A17 8GB192 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactVivo Y73
Faster wired charging33 W wired
Lighter build170 g
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A17 8GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 225
More storage256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 90Hz display6.7″ · 90Hz
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y73 vs Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB
Samsung Galaxy A17 8GB offers more storage than Y73, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and NFC. Vivo Y73, however, is lighter at 170 g versus 192 g and supports faster wired charging at 33 W versus 25 W. The main trade-off is Galaxy A17 8GB’s storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Y73’s faster charging and lighter build.
