OPPO Reno 14F
$499
OPPO Reno 14F vs Vivo Y73
Vivo Y73
$300
| Reno 14F | Y73 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 499 | USD 300 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 33 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 | MediaTek Helio G95 |
| Display | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.44" • AMOLED • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 64MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 199 cheaper
Y73USD 300
vsReno 14FUSD 499
Storage
2× more storage
Reno 14F256 GB
vsY73128 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
Reno 14F6,000 mAh
vsY734,000 mAh
Charging
12 W faster wired charging
Reno 14F45 W wired
vsY7333 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno 14FQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450
vsY73MediaTek Helio G95
Display
120 Hz refresh
Reno 14F120 Hz
vsY7360 Hz
Build
10 g lighter
Y73170 g
vsReno 14F180 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 14F
More storage256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.57-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y73
Much lower purchase priceUSD 300
Lighter build170 g
What CompareTab says about OPPO Reno 14F vs Vivo Y73
OPPO Reno 14F has the larger display and faster wired charging than Y73, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 45 W wired charging versus 33 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 16 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Vivo Y73, however, is around $199 cheaper, lighter at 170 g versus 180 g, and thinner at 7.38 mm versus 7.78 mm. The choice comes down to Reno 14F’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Y73’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
