Vivo Y03t
$105
Vivo Y03t vs OPPO A7 Pro 5G
OPPO A7 Pro 5G
$325
| Y03t | A7 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 105 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 45 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max |
| Display | 6.56" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 220 cheaper
Y03tUSD 105
vsA7 Pro 5GUSD 325
RAM
2 GB more RAM
A7 Pro 5G6 GB RAM
vsY03t4 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
A7 Pro 5G256 GB
vsY03t128 GB
Battery
60% larger battery
A7 Pro 5G8,000 mAh
vsY03t5,000 mAh
Charging
30 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro 5G45 W wired
vsY03t15 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Y03tUnisoc Tiger T612
vsA7 Pro 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max
Display
120 Hz refresh
A7 Pro 5G120 Hz
vsY03t90 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y03t
Much lower purchase priceUSD 105
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro 5G
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.57-inch
What CompareTab says about Vivo Y03t vs OPPO A7 Pro 5G
OPPO A7 Pro 5G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Y03t, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), and 45W charging. Vivo Y03t, however, is around $220 cheaper, lighter at 185 g versus 205 g, and thinner at 8.39 mm versus 8.8 mm. The main trade-off is A7 Pro 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Y03t’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
