Sparx S9
$41
Sparx S9 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| S9 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 41 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 3250 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 100 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.1" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 758 cheaper
S9USD 41
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
6× more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsS92 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
F9 Ultra256 GB
vsS932 GB
Battery
148% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsS93,250 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
S9Unisoc SC9832E
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsS96.1″ · 60Hz
Camera
Higher resolution
F9 Ultra200MP rear · 32MP front
vsS913MP rear · 5MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSparx S9
Much lower purchase priceUSD 41
Smaller 6.1-inch display6.1″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
Higher-resolution cameras200MP rear · 32MP front
What CompareTab says about Sparx S9 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than S9, with 12 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 3250 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Sparx S9, however, is around $758 cheaper. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus S9’s lower price.
