Sparx S9
$41
Sparx S9 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| S9 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 41 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 3250 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 100 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.1" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 658 cheaper
S9USD 41
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
6× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsS92 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsS932 GB
Battery
95% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsS93,250 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
S9Unisoc SC9832E
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsS96.1″ · 60Hz
Camera
Higher resolution
F9 Pro200MP rear · 32MP front
vsS913MP rear · 5MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSparx S9
Much lower purchase priceUSD 41
Smaller 6.1-inch display6.1″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
Higher-resolution cameras200MP rear · 32MP front
What CompareTab says about Sparx S9 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over S9, with 12 GB of RAM versus 2 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 3250 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Sparx S9, however, is around $658 cheaper. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus S9’s lower price.
