Sparx Neo 15 Pro
$96
Sparx Neo 15 Pro vs Tecno Camon 16
Tecno Camon 16
$149
| Neo 15 Pro | Camon 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 96 | USD 149 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 18 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek | MediaTek Helio G70 |
| Display | 6.79" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.8" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 48MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 53 cheaper
Neo 15 ProUSD 96
vsCamon 16USD 149
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Camon 1618 W wired
vsNeo 15 Pro10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Neo 15 ProMediaTek
vsCamon 16MediaTek Helio G70
Display
90 Hz refresh
Neo 15 Pro90 Hz
vsCamon 1660 Hz
Camera
Higher resolution
Camon 1648MP rear · 16MP front
vsNeo 15 Pro13MP rear · 8MP front
Build
More compact thickness
Neo 15 Pro8.8 mm
vsCamon 169.2 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSparx Neo 15 Pro
Much lower purchase priceUSD 96
Up to 90 Hz display6.79-inch
Thinner body8.8 mm
Best if you want
More hardwareTecno Camon 16
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Higher-resolution cameras48MP rear · 16MP front
What CompareTab says about Sparx Neo 15 Pro vs Tecno Camon 16
Tecno Camon 16 offers faster wired charging than Neo 15 Pro, with 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (48 MP versus 13 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (16 MP versus 8 MP). Sparx Neo 15 Pro, however, is around $53.00 cheaper and thinner at 8.8 mm versus 9.2 mm. The main trade-off is the Camon 16’s faster charging and higher-resolution cameras versus the Neo 15 Pro’s lower price and thinner body.
