Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
$242
Samsung Galaxy F36 5G vs vivo V60 Lite
vivo V60 Lite
$276
| Galaxy F36 5G | V60 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 242 | USD 276 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.77" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 34 cheaper
Galaxy F36 5GUSD 242
vsV60 LiteUSD 276
Battery
30% larger battery
V60 Lite6,500 mAh
vsGalaxy F36 5G5,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
V60 Lite90 W wired
vsGalaxy F36 5G25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy F36 5GSamsung Exynos 1380
vsV60 LiteQualcomm Snapdragon 685
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
V60 Lite32MP front
vsGalaxy F36 5G13MP front
Connectivity
Adds 5G
Galaxy F36 5G5G
vsV60 LiteNo 5G listed
Connectivity
Adds NFC
Galaxy F36 5GNFC
vsV60 LiteNo NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy F36 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 242
5G connectivity5G
NFCNFC
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo V60 Lite
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Higher-resolution front camera32MP front
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy F36 5G vs vivo V60 Lite
vivo V60 Lite offers a larger battery and faster wired charging than Galaxy F36 5G, with a 6500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh and 90 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP). Samsung Galaxy F36 5G, however, is cheaper at around $242 versus $276. The main trade-off is V60 Lite’s faster charging, battery capacity, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy F36 5G’s lower price.
