Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs vivo X300 E

close
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

$499

8 GB RAM 256 GB

close
vivo X300 E

vivo X300 E

$719

12 GB RAM 256 GB

Galaxy A72 256GBX300 E
PriceUSD 499USD 719
Battery5000 mAh7200 mAh
Charging (W)2590
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz
Main Camera64MP50MP
Front Camera32MP50MP
OSAndroid 11Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 220 cheaper
vsX300 EUSD 719
RAM
4 GB more RAM
vsGalaxy A72 256GB8 GB RAM
Battery
44% larger battery
vsGalaxy A72 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsX300 EQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Display
144 Hz refresh
vsGalaxy A72 256GB90 Hz
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
vsX300 E50MP rear

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 499
Higher-resolution main camera64MP rear
Best if you want

vivo X300 E

More hardware
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs vivo X300 E

vivo X300 E offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A72 256GB, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP). Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB, however, is around $220 cheaper. The main trade-off is X300 E’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A72 256GB’s lower price.