Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB
$499
Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs Motorola Moto G77 Power
Motorola Moto G77 Power
$264
| Galaxy A72 256GB | Moto G77 Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 499 | USD 264 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 30 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.72" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 235 cheaper
Moto G77 PowerUSD 264
vsGalaxy A72 256GBUSD 499
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy A72 256GB256 GB
vsMoto G77 Power128 GB
Battery
40% larger battery
Moto G77 Power7,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A72 256GB5,000 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Moto G77 Power30 W wired
vsGalaxy A72 256GB25 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A72 256GBQualcomm Snapdragon 720G
vsMoto G77 PowerMediaTek Dimensity 6400
Display
120 Hz refresh
Moto G77 Power120 Hz
vsGalaxy A72 256GB90 Hz
Build
12 g lighter
Galaxy A72 256GB203 g
vsMoto G77 Power215 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy A72 256GB
More storage256 GB
Lighter build203 g
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Moto G77 Power
Much lower purchase priceUSD 264
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.72-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB vs Motorola Moto G77 Power
Motorola Moto G77 Power has the larger display and faster wired charging than Galaxy A72 256GB, with a 7000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 30 W wired charging versus 25 W. Samsung Galaxy A72 256GB, however, is lighter at 203 g versus 215 g and thinner at 8.4 mm versus 8.89 mm and offers 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB. The main trade-off is Moto G77 Power’s faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A72 256GB’s lighter, thinner build.
