Samsung Galaxy A35
$367
Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo V70 FE
Vivo V70 FE
$500
| Galaxy A35 | V70 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 367 | USD 500 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 7360-Turbo |
| Display | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 133 cheaper
Galaxy A35USD 367
vsV70 FEUSD 500
RAM
4 GB more RAM
V70 FE12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A358 GB RAM
Battery
40% larger battery
V70 FE7,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A355,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
V70 FE90 W wired
vsGalaxy A3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A35Samsung Exynos Exynos 1380
vsV70 FEMediaTek Dimensity 7360-Turbo
Display
Larger display
V70 FE6.83-inch
vsGalaxy A356.6-inch
Build
9 g lighter
V70 FE200 g
vsGalaxy A35209 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 367
Smaller 6.6-inch display6.6″
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo V70 FE
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 6.83-inch6.83-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo V70 FE
Vivo V70 FE offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A35, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, a 6.83 inch display versus 6.6 inch, and 90 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP). Samsung Galaxy A35, however, is around $133 cheaper. The choice comes down to V70 FE’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution cameras versus Galaxy A35’s lower price.
